City of Alma v. Clow
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gratiot; Stone, J. Frank E. Clow was convicted of peddling without a license, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 or in default thereof to 40 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The respondent was convicted of a violation .of a city ordinance, and has brought the case here for review. The facts are substantially the same, so far as the acts of the respondent are concerned, as the case of City of Muskegon v. Zeeryp, 134 Mich. 181. If you substitute the word “ Clow” for the word “ Zeeryp,” the word “Alma”for the word “Muskegon,” and the word *44444 Saginaw ” for the words “ Grand Rapids,” in the. Case of Zeeryp, you would have substantially this case.
Alma is a city of the fourth class, incorporated under the provisions of Act No. 215 of the Public Acts of 1895. To such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Graffty v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Williams v. City of Rochester HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Mims v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Allport v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.