Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Branch. Complaint for violation of city ordinance. Bespondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

An ordinance of the city of Coldwater provides, among other things, that “ no person shall hawlc or peddle any meat, goods, wares or merchandise from door to door within the limits of the city of Coldwater without a license from the mayor.” For the license, when not for the sale of meat, fifteen dollars is required to be paid for one year, or three dollars for one day.

The defendant has been convicted under this ordinance, on evidence that without license he traveled from door to door in said city and sold a clothes-wringer. The clothes-wringers were manufactured by the defendant at Sturgis,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patterson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Pervear v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Kitson v. Mayor of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Ash v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Van Baalen v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Emert v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Hockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hall-Omar Baking Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & IndustriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. J. H. Clark Co. v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Ex parte BylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API