Legal Opinion

Union Savings Bank of San Jose v. Dunlap

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1902No. S.F. No. 2993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Judgment for plaintiff on a general demurrer to the complaint, from which defendant appeals. By appropriate proceedings, under the Banking Act of 1895 (Stats. 1895, p. 175), plaintiff was, on March 13, 1899, adjudged to be insolvent, and the court directed that the plaintiff corporation and all its assets be turned over by the bank com missioners, who then, held possession of them under said act, to the directors of the corporation, for the purpose of closing the affairs of plaintiff and liquidating its indebtedness, and it was alleged in the complaint that the said board of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Argues v. Union Sav. Bank of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bank of National City v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Sav. Bank of San Jose v. LeiterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. O'Dea v. Hollywood Cemetery Assoc.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Union Savings Bank v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Brookline Canning & Packing Co. v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API