Bank of National City v. Johnston
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
After the bank commissioners, acting under the authority given them by section 11 of the Banking Act, as amended in 1895 (Stats. 1895, p. 175), had seized and taken into possession all of the assets of the bank, and had reported the affair to the attorney-general, and he had commenced a suit to enjoin the transaction of further business, but before the court had acted- in reference to the matter, the directors adopted a resolution levying an assessment for the purpose of paying the debts of the corporation. The resolution recites that it was done at the request of the bank commissioners.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Warner v. MowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Sav. Bank of San Jose v. LeiterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Seal of Gold Mining Co. v. SlaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Union Savings Bank of San Jose v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Wenatchee-Stratford Orchard Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- Marshall County Bank v. Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.