Legal Opinion

Union Savings Bank v. Willard

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1907No. Civ. No. 273PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

“Action to recover from the defendant the amount of an assessment by the plaintiff upon the shares of its capital stock held by him. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.
“The authority of the plaintiff to levy the assessment and to collect the same by an action against its stockholders, together with the regularity of its proceedings therein, was affirmed in the cases of the same plaintiff against Dunlap, 135 Cal. 628, [67 Pac. 1084], and against Leiter, 145 Cal. 696, [79 Pac. 441], cases which involve the same assessment as that here presented. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. School District Number Two v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Union Sav. Bank of San Jose v. LeiterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Welles v. LarrabeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1888
  4. Visalia & Tulare Railroad v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Union Savings Bank of San Jose v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burke v. MazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. Perkins v. CowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Berkeley Hillside Properties Co. v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Brookline Canning & Packing Co. v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. La Habra Oil Co. v. FrancisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API