Brown v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STRINE, Chief Justice:
I. INTRODUCTION
Anzara Brown was convicted on various charges of drug dealing and drug possession following a jury trial in the Superior Court. In his direct appeal to this Court, Brown challenged three decisions of the Superior Court regarding the admissibility of certain evidence used against him at trial. Because we find that the Superior Court acted within its discretion to deny Brown’s suppression motions and admit the evidence, we affirm his judgment of convictions.
At oral argument on Brown’s appeal to this Court, his counsel informed the Court for the first time…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Tricoche v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Aricidiacono v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- BanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.