Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Soo Line Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1990No. 89-1176PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This appeal concerns the question of whether a private landowner and its business invitee owe a statutory or common law duty to guard against the risk of harm from obstructed visibility. The district court granted appellees’ motions for pretrial summary judgment, finding appellees owed no such duty. We transferred the case to the court of appeals which, on an evenly divided vote, affirmed the summary judgment by operation of law. We granted further review and now affirm the decision of the court of appeals and judgment of the district court.

Our review in actions at law is for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. Larsen v. United Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Wilson v. NepstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Thompson v. KaczinskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. Hoffnagle v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Van Essen v. Farmers Cooperative ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Bitner v. Ottumwa Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API