Legal Opinion

Critz v. Sparger.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

MotioN of appellant for writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

Tlie petition is not verified as demanded by Rule 42 and there is no transcript of the record proper, nor reason given for its absence and nothing to negative laches in not having that, and the case on appeal also, docketed. Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N. C., 277 and cases cited; Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622; Parker v. Railroad and Rothchild v. McNichol, the last two at this term. It is true it is alleged that the case on appeal was filed in the Clerk’s office and that the Clerk has failed to send up the transcript, but there is no allegation that the appellant has tendered the fees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Avery v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Brown v. . HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMillan v. . McMillanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Norwood v. . PrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API