Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Norwood v. . Pratt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1899Published

MotioN for a writ of certiorari, to be directed to the Superior Court of Orange County. Motion denied. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1ConcurrenceClark, J.

The settled practice upon such applications as this is thus stated in Burwell v. Hughes, 120 N. C., 277 (which was an appeal from the same County and in which the same counsel represented the appellant) : “It was the duty of the appellant at such first term to file all the transcript that was available, and have asked for a certiorari to complete the transcript. His failure to do so is a lack of diligence and forfeits his appeal. Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 1622; Haynes v. Coward, 116 N. C., 840; Graham v. Edwards, 114 N. C., 228; Sanders v. Thompson, Ibid, 282; State v. James, 108 N. C., 792;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Graham v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Haynes v. . CowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Morrison v. . CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Collins v. . FaribaultSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API