Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ai

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 14, 1998No. 97-1004; Crim.App. No. 9600416PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge:

During January and March 1996, appellant was tried by a special court-martial composed of members at Fort Carson, Colorado. Contrary to pleas, he was found guilty of 2 specifications of requesting graft, in violation of Article 184, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to *2a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, and reduction to pay grade E-l. On June 6, 1996, the convening authority approved the sentence. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed these results without opinion on April 30, 1997.

On September 29, 1997, this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. NewCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  5. United States v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API