Legal Opinion

In Re Franklin Nat. Bank Securities Litigation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 4, 1978No. 75 C 684PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

445 F.Supp. 723 (1978)

In re FRANKLIN NATIONAL BANK SECURITIES LITIGATION

Robert GOLD, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

and

Louis Pergament, Intervenor-Plaintiff,

v.

ERNST & ERNST et al., Defendants.

No. 75 C 684.[*]

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

January 17, 1978.

For Supplemental Opinion May 4, 1978.

Milberg, Weiss, Bershad & Specthrie, New York City, Liaison Attys. for class plaintiffs, for plaintiff Gold in No. 75 C 684.

Jessel Rothman, Mineola, N. Y., for intervenor plaintiff Pergament in No. 75 C 684; Melvyn I. Weiss, Jerome M. Congress,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  2. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  3. State v. HoggCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BakerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
  5. Harmsen v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API