Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grange Insurance Co of Michigan v. Edward Lawrence

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2013No. Docket 145206, 143808Published

1ConcurrenceZahra, J.

I concur in the result reached by the majority in these cases. I also agree with the majority that a person, including a minor child, can have only one domicile at any given time. I disagree, however, with the rule the majority has adopted for determining the domicile of a child with two legal residences under the Child Custody Act1 for several reasons. The majority *517holds that the domicile of a child with two legal residences is necessarily equated with a family court order establishing physical custody of that child, regardless of whether the parents in fact follow the family court’s order.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dairyland Insurance v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API