Grange Insurance Co of Michigan v. Edward Lawrence
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceZahra, J.
I concur in the result reached by the majority in these cases. I also agree with the majority that a person, including a minor child, can have only one domicile at any given time. I disagree, however, with the rule the majority has adopted for determining the domicile of a child with two legal residences under the Child Custody Act1 for several reasons. The majority *517holds that the domicile of a child with two legal residences is necessarily equated with a family court order establishing physical custody of that child, regardless of whether the parents in fact follow the family court’s order.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Dairyland Insurance v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.