Legal Opinion
In Re Chadwick
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1991No. 83-1294PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
On July 27, 1989, the Supreme Court of California ordered that respondent William J. Chadwick be suspended for five years from the practice of law in California, with an actual suspension period of one year, and probation involving a number of conditions. 1 Before us is a recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that reciprocal discipline be imposed upon respondent pursuant to D.C.App.R. XI § 11 (1990). Respondent interposes before us no objection to the proposed action.
We generally agree with the analysis set forth by the Board in its annexed report and accept its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of CouryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re RamacciottiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re ChadwickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.