Legal Opinion

Luckehe v. Reclamation District No. 2054

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1925No. Docket No. 2905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action to annul an assessment levied against plaintiff’s property situated in Reclamation District No. 2054, in Sutter and Butte Counties, on the ground that said property was illegally included within said district, not being the character of swamp and overflow land subject to reclamation as provided by statute.

The action was brought under the provisions of section 3462 of the Political Code of the state of California. The complaint alleges the formation of the reclamation district pursuant to the provisions of title 8,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lower Kings River Reclamation District, No. 531 v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Reclamation District No. 542 v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitley v. Islais Creek Reclamation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Wilbur v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API