Legal Opinion

United States v. Eric Scanlan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 27, 2012No. 10-3377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Eric S. Scanlan pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court set a base offense level of 24, see U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2), relying in part on a California burglary conviction that the district court considered a crime of violence. Scanlan argues that the district court committed plain error by treating the burglary conviction as a crime of violence. We affirm the sentence.

Police in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, arrested Scanlan after receiving a tip that he would be arriving in town by bus from California wearing a bulletproof vest and carrying…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. People v. Letner and TobinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. United States v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. RauppCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API