Legal Opinion

Sessions v. Dimaya

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 17, 2018No. 15–1498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vague laws invite arbitrary power. Before the Revolution, the crime of treason in English law was so capaciously construed that the mere expression of disfavored opinions could invite transportation or death. The founders cited the crown's abuse of "pretended" crimes like this as one of their reasons for revolution. See Declaration of Independence ¶ 21. Today's vague laws may not be as invidious, but they can invite the exercise of arbitrary *1224power all the same-by leaving the people in the dark about what the law demands and allowing prosecutors and courts to make it up.

The law before us today…

Also in this document: Dissent · Roberts; Dissent · Thomas.

2Cases cited109 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GildhouseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. People v. AvenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API