Legal Opinion

United States v. Raupp

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 9, 2012No. 11-2215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

673 F.3d 638 (2012)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Anthony RAUPP, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-2215.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued November 2, 2011.

Decided March 9, 2012.

Matthew J. Rinka (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William E. Marsh, Juval O. Scott (argued), Attorneys, Indiana Federal Community Defenders, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Anthony Raupp pleaded guilty to possessing…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mouloki v. EpeeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. Exelon Generation Co v. Local 15, ICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API