Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The sole issue to be determined by this court is whether wireless telecommunications providers, such as appellees, AT&T and Ameritech, are public utilities for the purposes of R.C. 519.211. Appellant, Nicholas R. Campanelli, asserts that wireless telecommunications providers are not public utilities within the scope of R.C. 519.211, and are thus subject to the restrictions contained in local zoning ordinances. Appellees, AT&T and Ameritech, however, *105contend that wireless telecommunications providers are public utilities and are therefore exempt from local zoning ordinances pursuant to R.C.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marano v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- A & B Refuse Disposers, Inc. v. Board of Ravenna Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- GTE Wireless of Midwest Inc. v. Anderson TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Washington Twp. Trustees v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Dovetail Energy, L.L.C. v. Bath Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.