Legal Opinion
State v. Arnold
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1991No. Nos. 90-296 and 90-306PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*176 State v. Arnold
No. 90-296
State v. Dickey
No. 90-306
Anthony G. Pizza, prosecuting attorney, and Lawrence J. Kiroff, for appellee state of Ohio in case No. 90-296. Lynn C. Slaby, prosecuting attorney, Philip D. Bogdanoff and Maureen C. Hardy, for appellee state of Ohio in case No. 90-306. Gordon A. Senerius, for appellant Arnold in case No. 90-296. Cook, Davis & Briggs Co., L.P.A., Lawrence J. Cook and Marcus M. Lombardi, for appellant Dickey in case No. 90-306. Herbert R. Brown, J.
For the reasons which follow, we hold that the provisions of R.C. 2925.03(C), which require a sentence of actual…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- In re WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by40 opinions
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ElmoreOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Coleman, Unpublished Decision (2-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.