Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a motion filed by Boehringer Ingelheim Vet-medica, Inc. Boehringer Ingelheixn/Nobl Laboratories, Inc., Regents of University of Minnesota and South Dakota State Uni-versify (hereinafter collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Boehringer”) seeking a preliminary injunction against Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering Corporation (hereinafter collectively “Defendants” or “Schering”) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283 (1988) for violating its patent. 1 For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs’ motion is Denied.
I. Background
A.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Venetec International, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. Apotex Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.