Legal Opinion

Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 2, 2000No. Civ. 96-4047(HAA)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion filed by Boehringer for a permanent injunction and by motions filed by Schering Corp. and Schering-Plough Corp. (hereinafter “Schering”) for a judgment as a matter of law, a new trial and a stay of any injunction during the pendency of these post-trial motions. For the reasons set forth below, Boehringer’s motion for a permanent injunction is hereby granted, Schering’s request for a stay of that injunction is denied and as discussed below, this Court seeks further guidance from Schering regarding its…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Communications Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  3. MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  5. RMH Tech LLC v. PMC Indus., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API