Legal Opinion

Moore-Sapp Investors v. Richards

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1999No. A99A0918, A99A0919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

We granted the applications of Moore-Sapp Investors and the City of Brunswick, Georgia, for interlocutory appeal in this premises liability case to review the trial court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment. We conclude that their motions should have been granted, and we reverse the judgments below.

The record shows that while walking across property owned by Moore-Sapp to reach a grocery store, the plaintiff, John Richards, stepped into a hole where a City of Brunswick water meter either was or had been at one time. It was dark, and Richards did not see the hole.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Flagler Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Trammell v. BairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Brooks v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Durham v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. R. W. Holdco, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Howard v. Gram Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Roofing Supply of Atlanta, Inc. v. Forrest Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Barnes v. St. Stephen's Missionary Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. McGarity v. Hart Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API