Legal Opinion

Howard v. Gram Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 2004No. A04A0476PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

Mary Howard fell in a radio station’s lobby and fractured her hip. She sued The Gram Corporation (“Gram”), which owned the radio station, for damages. Gram moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. On appeal, Howard challenges this ruling. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a *467matter of law.1 We review the evidence and record de novo, construing all reasonable conclusions and inferences in favor of the nonmovant.2

Viewed in this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Nave v. HixenbaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Frankel v. AntmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Burrow v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. Heritage Investments, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Georgia Department of Corrections v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. McGarity v. Hart Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Matlack v. Cobb Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Georgia Department of Transportation v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API