Legal Opinion
Curtner v. Lyndon
California Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1900No. S.F. No. 1320PublishedCited by 15 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Action against a sheriff for conversion of personal property by levy and sale under execution. Plaintiff claims to be the owner of the property. The facts are these: •Cunningham was the owner of the Ynigo ranch. He entered into a cropping contract with one Cropley, whereby he was to have a certain share of the grain and hay raised upon a portion of the ranch. Execution was levied upon the interest of Cunningham in these growing crops, whereupon he gave to Curtner, who was his creditor to a large amount, the following order:
“Santa Cruz, Cal., May 26, 1896.
“Mr. Charles Cropley:
“You will please…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Brown v. O'NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Pope v. HuthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by15 opinions
- Conolley v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Donohoe-Kelly Banking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RodgersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. WilliamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Baumgarten v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.