Legal Opinion

Bernal v. Hovious

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1861PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth District. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

Cope, J. concurring.

This is an action for the possession of five hundred and twenty sacks of oats, ninety-three sacks of wheat and two hundred sacks of barley, alleged to be the property of the plaintiff, and to have been unlawfully taken and detained by the defendants; and arises upon the following facts: Some time in 1857, one José Maria Vasques entered into a verbal agreement with one Nicholas Bernal in relation to the use and cultivation of a farm situated in San Mateo county. The agreement is called by the parties a lease. The substance of Vasques’ testimony with reference to it is, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caswell v. DistrichNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Visher v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Beaumont v. CraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  4. Harrower v. HeathNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Waldman v. BroderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Davis v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Schneider v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Roberts v. ColyearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Walls v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API