North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of Durham v. Bland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
The first objection of appellant to the judgment is founded on the theory that the execution sale and the ensuing deed are void because “the Sheriff failed to allot the homestead to R. E. Bland and his wife, Louisa Bland.” This assumption rests, in turn, upon these three successive and diverse hypotheses: (1) That the acts of the judgment debtors were insufficient in form to waive their homestead rights in the land embraced by the deed; (2) that the judgment debtors were incapacitated by law to waive such rights in the land even if their acts were adequate in form to effect such purpose; and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aldridge v. Greensboro Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Abernethy Land & Finance Co. v. First Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Cameron v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Den Ex Dem. Dobson v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stokes v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Boone v. GrierCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Mortensen v. Berzell Investments Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Hazel v. Van BeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- North Carolina National Bank v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980