Legal Opinion

Lacey v. Porter

California Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1894No. 19325PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

On October 13, 1891, defendant, Porter, made complaint against the plaintiff, Lacey, charging him with threatening to enter upon and detain, by force and violence, the lands of the Porter Land and Water Company, a corporation, in which Porter was a large stockholder. Upon this complaint the .justice of the peace' issued a warrant, and Lacey was arrested the same day, but being unable to give bail that evening was com*601mitted to jail, where he remained seventeen hours. He was afterwards examined before the justice and discharged, and thereupon brought this action against Porter for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  3. Grant v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kolka v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Estate of Morey v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API