Legal Opinion

Ex parte Munford

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1874PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Judge:—

The petitioner avers that he was subpoenaed to appear before C. P. Ellerbe, a notary public, and give his deposition in a cause alleged to be pending in the St Louis Circuit Court, wherein Alexander Turnbull and others were plaintiffs and James E. Munford and others defendants. That upon bis failure to obey the subpoena, he was compelled by attachment *604to appear; but then declined to testify or to answer any of the questions propounded, because there was, in fact, no such suit pending as alleged, within the meaning of the statute which authorizes the taking of depositions. That…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte MckeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State ex rel. Evans v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Pieper v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Muirhead v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. In re SanfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API