Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Leis v. Ferguson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1948No. 31263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

This being an action in mandamus,. the precise point for decision is whether respondent should be directed to issue a warrant covering the described local expenses of relator as “an act which the law specially enjoins as a duty resulting from [his] * * * office.” Section 12283, General Code.

In disposing of the controversy, the statutes quoted below are pertinent.

Section 6064-2, General Code, provides, in part:

‘ ‘ The Department of Liquor Control is hereby created, to consist of a Board of Liquor Control of four members, * * * and a Director of Liqiior Control. ’ ’

Section 154-17, General Code,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corbett v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hedrick v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McKelveyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Krabach v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Koch v. RhodesOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Koch v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State ex rel. Ferguson v. MaloonOhio Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API