State Ex Rel. Leis v. Ferguson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
This being an action in mandamus,. the precise point for decision is whether respondent should be directed to issue a warrant covering the described local expenses of relator as “an act which the law specially enjoins as a duty resulting from [his] * * * office.” Section 12283, General Code.
In disposing of the controversy, the statutes quoted below are pertinent.
Section 6064-2, General Code, provides, in part:
‘ ‘ The Department of Liquor Control is hereby created, to consist of a Board of Liquor Control of four members, * * * and a Director of Liqiior Control. ’ ’
Section 154-17, General Code,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Corbett v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Hedrick v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McKelveyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Krabach v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Koch v. RhodesOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Koch v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1964
- State ex rel. Ferguson v. MaloonOhio Supreme Court · 1961