Legal Opinion

Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1965No. Civ. 22338PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.

The main question confronting us in this case is whether a seaman who has terminated his employment as required by provisions of a collective bargaining agreement fixing limited tenure of employment under a system of job rotation is disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits because “he left his most recent work voluntarily without good cause” within the meaning of Unem ployment Insurance Code section 1256. We hold that the employee did not thereby leave his employment voluntarily since at the time of his separation he did not in reality choose to quit. Nor do we believe he should be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. United States Fire Insurance v. JohansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Keyes Motors, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Forsman v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API