High Fidelity Enterprises, Inc. v. Hull
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DEVINE, J.—
The corporation which is plaintiff and appellant agreed to buy a parcel of property shortly before defendant-respondent actually bought it and received a deed to it, the former owner having made this situation possible by a complicated series of transactions. Plaintiff seeks specific performance. This owner, Gordon Pusser, had been employed by High Fidelity Enterprises, but was discharged in October 1959, and because there was litigation between him and his former employer and he feared attachment of the property, he conveyed the bare legal title, without consideration, to David G.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dreyfus v. HirtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Randall v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Three Sixty Five Club v. ShostakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- McLane v. Van EatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Saxon v. DuBoisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gates Rubber Co. v. UlmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Claremont Terrace Homeowners' Ass'n v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Probasco v. Eads (In re Probasco)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Wolf v. Heinig (In Re Heinig)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.