Legal Opinion

Quill v. Gallivan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1886No. 12,849PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Erom the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee is for the recovery of real estate, and is against two of the appellants,. Michael and Ellen Quill.

The complaint is undoubtedly good as against the defendants named in it, and an attack upon it in the assignment of errors by parties subsequently brought into the case can .not. prevail. If a complaint is good as against the parties against whom it is directed, it can not be successfully challenged for the first time in the assignment of errors made by parties. '. brought into court on the application of one of the original defendants.

If the parties interested in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Glantz v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hamrick v. LoringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Stalcup v. DixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Manor v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Studabaker v. MarkleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API