United States v. Grembowicz
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Per curiam
We have examined the record of trial, clemency recommendations, Goode comments, the assignments of error and the Government’s reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the. appellant was committed.
The appellant avers that the evidence is insufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he authored the several letters of disrespect and threat delivered to his commanding officer. While none of the facts on its own merit conclusively supports the findings of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. BostonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. LewisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. CaverNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- United States v. KishU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992