Legal Opinion

United States v. Boston

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 3, 1979No. ACM S24727PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

EARLY, Chief Judge:

This case has been submitted to us on the merits. In our examination of the allied records of trial we have discovered a matter warranting corrective action. In view of our disposition of this issue, we express no opinion, at this stage, on the merits of the ease.

After completion of the post trial review of the staff judge advocate, the defense counsel, pursuant to the mandate of United States v. Goode, 1 M.J. 3 (C.M.A.1975), submitted eleven paragraphs of comments on the review. Nowhere in the review of the staff judge advocate can we find any indication of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. StockmanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
  3. United States v. JohnstoneU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. HardestyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. ReddingU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. NarineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. BostonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. PowisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. CoteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. GrembowiczU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API