Legal Opinion

Ulysses, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 7, 2014No. 1:06-cv-00436PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Equal Access to Justice Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2412; Substantial Justification; Government Counterclaims; False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(c) (2000); Contract Disputes Act Fraud Provision, 41 U.S.C. § 604 (2000); Forfeiture of Fraudulent Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (2000).

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAMS, Judge

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs application for an award of attorney’s fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2012). In the underlying action, Plaintiff prevailed in establishing that the Government improperly canceled one of two…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Meyer v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Small v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API