Legal Opinion

Miles ex rel. Kamferbeek v. Fortney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 131PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Fred Kamferbeek and Delbert Fortney were contesting candidates for the office of sheriff of Ottawa county at the general election held on November 7, 1922. A stipulation appears in the record which clearly presents in detail the facts involved. Pertinent to the question presented here for determination, it appears the returns of inspectors of that election to the board of county canvassers showed Kamferbeek had a majority of 148. Fortney demanded a recount of named election precincts, followed by Kamferbeek demanding a recount in all precincts of the county. The canvassing board complied and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lindstrom v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Harwood v. StillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Horning v. Board of Canvassers of Saginaw Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Anderson v. RinehartMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Attorney General ex rel. McCall v. KirbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kenneth Henes Special Projects Procurement, Marketing & Consulting Corp. v. Continental Biomass Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rathbun v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Webster v. Rotary Electric Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re School District No. 6Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API