Lindstrom v. Board of Canvassers
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel a recount of the votes cast at the November election for the office of county treasurer. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
The relator asks for a mandamus to compel a recount of the votes cast at the late election for the various candidates for the office of county treasurer. The relator was a candidate for the office, but on the official returns is shown to have received less than a plurality.
Among other statements in the petition is the following:
“ Your petitioner further shows that the said inspectors in all of said wards and townships counted votes for said Peter Friske [relator’s opponent] which were voted upon tickets which were printed upon ballots that bore distinguishing and distinctive marks, other than…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Adsit v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by22 opinions
- Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Taylor v. BleakleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Miles ex rel. Kamferbeek v. FortneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Boyd v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Groesbeck v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.