Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Board of Canvassers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1893PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel a recount of the votes cast at the November election for the office of county treasurer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

The relator asks for a mandamus to compel a recount of the votes cast at the late election for the various candidates for the office of county treasurer. The relator was a candidate for the office, but on the official returns is shown to have received less than a plurality.

Among other statements in the petition is the following:

“ Your petitioner further shows that the said inspectors in all of said wards and townships counted votes for said Peter Friske [relator’s opponent] which were voted upon tickets which were printed upon ballots that bore distinguishing and distinctive marks, other than…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adsit v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Taylor v. BleakleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  3. Miles ex rel. Kamferbeek v. FortneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Boyd v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Groesbeck v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API