Legal Opinion

Horning v. Board of Canvassers of Saginaw Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Certiorari to Saginaw; Wilber and Snow, JJ. Mandamus by Washburn Horning to compel the board of canvassers of Saginaw county to count certain ballots rejected by it as invalid. From an order granting the writ, respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The relator, Washburn Horning, and James Creen, were rival candidates for the office of county treasurer of Saginaw county. Upon the face of the returns, Mr. Horning had 101 majority. Mr. Creen petitioned the board of county canvassers for a recount in a number of voting precincts, among which was the township of Chesaning. The recount was granted. The only question involved is whether a proper disposition was made of the votes of that township. The returns from Chesaning show that 346 votes were cast for Mr. Horning, and 123 for Mr. Creen. Upon the recount by the board of canvassers, 174…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Stout v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Storms v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Middleton v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hammond v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Attorney General Ex Rel. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Dithmar v. BunnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Perkins v. BertrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Miles ex rel. Kamferbeek v. FortneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API