Legal Opinion

Attorney General ex rel. Harwood v. Stillson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Quo warranto by the Attorney General, on the relation of John Harwood, against Francis 0. Stillson, to determine the title to the office of commissioner of schools for the county of Newaygo. On demurrer to the replication. Overruled.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The relator was a candidate for the office of commissioner of schools in the county of Newaygo at the spring election of 1895. A certificate of election issued to Stillson, an opposing candidate, who entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office, and an information was filed, at the instance of the relator, to try the title to the office. It is before us on demurrer to the replication.

The replication alleges that the relator received votes to the number of 1,351, outside of the township of Sheridan, as against 1,148 for Stillson, — a plurality for relator of 203; and that, in that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Seavitt v. McQuadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People ex rel. Hartwick v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Miles ex rel. Kamferbeek v. FortneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. St. Joseph Township v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Gracey v. Grosse Pointe Farms ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Caudill v. StidhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API