Legal Opinion

Neely v. Blumenthal

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 6, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-1515PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIRICA, District Judge.

The question presented in this case, a federal employment discrimination suit raising related Title VII and constitutionally-based damage claims, is the scope of the exclusivity rule laid down in Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 96 S.Ct. 1961, 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). In particular, the question is whether Brown, in addition to preempting non-Title VII employment discrimination claims brought against federal employers in their official capacities, also extinguishes ancillary damage claims that are based on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  2. Doe v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Stewart v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  5. Bartel v. Federal Aviation AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API