Legal Opinion
Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 2010No. 07-35061PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
The petition for rehearing, filed August 20, 2009, is GRANTED and the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
This court’s opinion filed, August 6, 2009 and published at Upper Skagit Tribe v. Washington, 576 F.3d 920 (9th Cir.2009), is hereby withdrawn. A new opinion is filed concurrently herewith.
OPINION
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
This case arises out of, and is a sub-proceeding of, United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312 (W.D.Wash.1974) (“Decision I”), where Judge Boldt determined the usual and accustomed fishing grounds (“U & A”) for Puget Sound tribes.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Tulalip Tribes v. Suquamish Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.