Legal Opinion
Tulalip Tribes v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2015No. 13-35773PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In this treaty fishing rights case, the Tulalip Tribes (“the Tulalip”) invoked the district court’s continuing jurisdiction as provided by the permanent injunction in United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312, 419 (W.D.Wash.1974) (.Decision I), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), by filing a request for determination of the scope of the Suquamish Indian Tribe’s (“the Su-quamish”) usual and accustomed fishing grounds and stations (“U & A”). The Tulalip sought a determination that the Suquamish’s U & A, as determined by Judge Boldt in 1975, does not include…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
- United States v. Suquamish Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Muckleshoot Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Makah Indian Tribe v. Quileute Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Suquamish Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.