Legal Opinion

Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe v. Lummi Nation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 1, 2017No. 15-35661PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal asks whether the Treaty of Point Elliott (the “Treaty”) reserves to the Lummi Nation (the “Lummi”) the right to fish in the waters west of Whidbey Island, Washington. We previously , concluded that the Treaty secures the Lummfs right to fish in Admiralty Inlet because the Lummi would have used the Inlet as a passage to travel from its home in the San Juan Is-' lands to present-day Seattle. The same result holds here because the waters at issue are situated directly between the San Juan Islands and Admiralty Inlet and also would have served as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
  3. United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1985
  5. Lwr Elwha Klallam Indian Tribe v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
  4. State Of Washington v. Hazen Graham ShopbellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Lummi NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API