Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 28, 1990No. 89-P-25PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment, entered after a jury trial, awarding the plaintiff damages for injuries received when a door at one of the defendant’s loading docks in Lawrence fell on the plaintiff. The primary planks in the defendant’s appeal are that its motion for judg ment notwithstanding the verdict should have been allowed as there was insufficient evidence of the defendant’s negligence and that it was error for the judge to instruct the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. The defendant also argues: that the judge abused his discretion in permitting the testimony of a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Solimene v. B. GRAUEL & CO., KGMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Zezuski v. Jenny Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Edwards v. BolandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. GiontzisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Rubin v. IsaksonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  5. Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API