Legal Opinion

Pashak v. Barish

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1982No. 1645PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in dismissing her complaint with prejudice. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the court below.

In May 1976, appellant’s husband, William Pashak, 1 was injured while working as a longshoreman. In September of that year, he sued the ship’s owner in federal court alleging that the ship was unseaworthy and that the shipowner had been negligent. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Pashak retained appellees as his attorneys to prosecute the federal action. In 1979, appellees recommended, and Mr. Pashak agreed, to settle the case for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Schenkel v. MonheitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Duke & Co. v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Thompson v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Dale Kaymark v. Bank of America NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Adamski v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Mariscotti v. TinariSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Jarzyna v. Home Properties, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API