Legal Opinion
Dale Kaymark v. Bank of America NA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 7, 2015No. 14-1816PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
Dale Kaymark defaulted on a mortgage held by Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”). On behalf of BOA, Udren Law Offices, P.C. (“Udren”) initiated foreclosure proceedings against Kaymark in state court. The body of the Foreclosure Complaint listed certain not-yet-incurred fees as due and owing, which Kaymark alleges violated several state and federal fair debt collec tion laws and breached the mortgage contract. Because we conclude that Kaymark has sufficiently pled that the disputed fees constituted actionable misrepresentation under the Fair Debt Collection…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Cohen v. Rosicki, Rosicki & Assocs., P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Paula Jensen v. Pressler & PresslerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- James Tepper v. Amos Financial LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.