Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

Lani G. Harkness (Claimant) petitions for review of the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the Referee’s denial of benefits by Federated Logistics t/a Macy’s Department Store (Employer) pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1

The facts initially found by the Referee and adopted by the Board are as follows:

1. For this appeal, the claimant was last employed by Federated Logistics t/a Macy’s Department Store for about 26 months. The claimant’s last day of work was August 22, 2003, at the wage rate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Dauphin County Bar Ass'n v. MazzacaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Lee Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Walacavage v. Excell 2000, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Henize v. GilesOhio Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harkness v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Leone v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Piunti v. COM., DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Piunti v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor and Industry, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API