Legal Opinion
Piunti v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor and Industry, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 13, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge McGINLEY.
This is the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s (Respondent) Preliminary Objections to the Amended Petition for Review in the Nature of a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Respondent, filed by four Pennsylvania licensed attorneys who routinely practice in the area of unemployment compensation (Petitioners).
On February 3, 2005, this Court in Harkness v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 867 A.2d 728 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005), appeal granted, 584 Pa. 533, 885 A.2d 980 (2005), held that the Unem*1019ployment Compensation Law1 did not permit representation of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Wajert v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Piunti v. COM., DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Rogers v. Thomas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013