Legal Opinion
Zar v. South Dakota Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 9, 1992No. 91-3517PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Dr. David Zar appeals from the district court’s1 decision denying his motion to compel production of documents, its decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all of his federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985, and its decision to abstain from consideration of injunctive relief. We affirm.
I. Background
Dr. Zar is a psychologist in South Dakota. In April of 1983, the South Dakota Board of Examiners of Psychologists (the Board) hired attorney Charles Dorothy to investigate complaints made against Dr. Zar. On September 12,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dr. David Zar v. South Dakota Board Of Examiners Of PsychologistsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Wayfield v. Town of TisburyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Carhart v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2001