Legal Opinion

Dr. David Zar v. South Dakota Board Of Examiners Of Psychologists

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1992No. 91-3517PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

976 F.2d 459

Dr. David ZAR, Appellant,

v.

The SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS;

Rosemarie Reardon, W. Vail Williams, Kay Assam, Val Farmer,

Thomas Jackson, Eugene P. Engen, S. Richard Gunn, and Donald

J. Taylor, as members of the South Dakota Board of Examiners

of Psychologists and individually; Paula S. Knutson,

individually and in her official capacity; Charles Dorothy,

individually and in his official capacity; Craig Eichstadt

and Sherri L. Sundem Wald, individually and in their

capacity as Assistant Attorney Generals of the State of

South Dakota; and John Does, "A" through "Z" whose

ide…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Scheeler v. City Of St. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Czechorowski v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. David Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API